WIFO Working Papers

Diskussionspapiere von Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern, Konsulenten und Gästen des WIFO – Seit 2006 ausschließlich online verfügbar – Download kostenlos

Die WIFO Working Papers beruhen nicht notwendigerweise auf einer abgestimmten Position des WIFO. Die Autorinnen und Autoren wurden über die Richtlinien der Österreichischen Agentur für wissenschaftliche Integrität (ÖAWI) zur Guten Wissenschaftlichen Praxis informiert, insbesondere bezüglich der Dokumentation aller Elemente, die für eine Nachvollziehbarkeit der Ergebnisse notwendig sind.

Fragen richten Sie bitte an die jeweiligen Autorinnen und Autoren!

SucheErweiterte Suche

Detailansicht

Michael Anyadike-Danes, Carl Magnus Bjuggren, Michel Dumont, Sandra Gottschalk, Werner Hölzl, Dan Johansson, Mika Maliranta, Anja Myrann, Kristian Nielsen, Guanyu Zheng
An International Comparison of the Contribution to Job Creation by High-growth Firms
WIFO Working Papers, 2018, (563), 33 Seiten
Online seit: 17.05.2018 0:00
This paper addresses three simple questions: how should the contribution of high-growth firms to job creation be measured? how much does this contribution vary across countries? to what extent does the cross-country variation depend on variation in the proportion of high-growth firms in the business population? The first is a methodological question which we answer using a more highly articulated version of the standard job creation and destruction accounts. The other two are empirical questions which we answer using a purpose-built data set assembled from national firm-level sources and covering nine countries, spanning the ten three year periods from 2000-2003 to 2009-2012. The basic principle governing the development of the accounting framework is the choice of appropriate comparators. Firstly, when measuring contributions to job creation, we should focus on just job creating firms, otherwise we are summing over contributions from firms with positive, zero, and negative job creation numbers. Secondly, because we know growth depends in part on size, the "natural" comparison for high-growth firms is with job creation by similar-sized firms which simply did not grow as fast as high-growth firms. However, we also show how the measurement framework can be further extended to include, for example, a consistent measure of the contribution of small job creating firms. On the empirical side, we find that the high-growth firm share of job creation by large job creating firms varies across countries by a factor of 2, from around one third to two thirds. A relatively small proportion of this cross-country variation is accounted for by variations in the influence of high-growth firms on job creation. On average high-growth firms generated between three or four times as many jobs as large non-high-growth job creating firms, but this ratio is relatively similar across countries. The bulk of the cross-country variation in high-growth firm contribution to job creation is accounted for by the relative abundance (or rarity) of high-growth firms. Moreover, we also show that the measurement of abundance depends upon the choice of measurement framework: the "winner" of a cross-national high-growth firm "beauty contest" on one measure will not necessarily be the winner on another.
JEL-Codes:D22, E24, L11, L25, L26, M13
Keywords:high-growth firms, firm growth, job creation
Forschungsbereich:Industrie-, Innovations- und internationale Ökonomie
Sprache:Englisch